Mahmoud Nabavian, Deputy Chairman of the National Security Commission of the Iranian Parliament, sharply criticized the proposed agreement with the United States:
The United States has told the Iranian side that it will secure a $300 billi...
Mahmoud Nabavian, Deputy Chairman of the National Security Commission of the Iranian Parliament, sharply criticized the proposed agreement with the United States:
The United States has told the Iranian side that it will secure a $300 billion reconstruction budget for the country from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. an amount that, it is clear, will not be provided.
If the United States later claims that it asked Saudi Arabia to pay but they refused, what will you do?
When the text of the agreement states that expenditures must be carried out with the consent of both parties, it means the United States will also have a say in how and where the money is spent. So if America says this money should not be allocated to a particular area because it might reach the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), what will you do then?
I assure you that no real funds will enter the country, nor will you have full authority to independently decide where these funds are spent.
According to the text of the agreement, we will not have the right to rebuild our nuclear program, and the United States will not lift any sanctions.
In light of the agreement’s text, the Parliament’s plan concerning the Strait of Hormuz has effectively been rendered useless.
Freeing Iran’s assets means that cash must actually reach us, as it did during the Rouhani administration (JCPOA).
According to the text of the agreement, we will become a colony of the United States.
